If you run an instance that has closed invitations (by policy, not temporarily due to load or spam), I'd be interested in chatting with you about why your instance is closed, and how/if you allow new members, and what you do for people who you can't/won't let in. (I run a closed instance myself and LOVE it, so I'm just looking to get a sense of current practice, not for debate.) #mastodamins
@darius I keep a single-user instance so no registrations. There are a lot of reasons for it, as it is the 3rd instance I've used on Mastodon. Mostly, I just want total control over my own data.
I run a closed instance myself 😃
@kao98 Nice! I see you have 7 users. Is it just for you and some friends?
- why your instance is closed: harassment, abuse, fascists
- how/if you allow new members: we have a sign-up form on our website
-what you do for people who you can't/won't let in: nothing, because the only reason they wouldn't be let in is if they are a known harasser or gave otherwise pro-fascist answers on the sign-up form
@darius our instance is invite-only and always was, I guess that was the idea of the tiny community. It's in anabiosis now.
If I made an instance, I would check people manually. Otherwise you just open doors for spammers and nazis.
@darius potential users of MSP Social can send an email, the link is on the front page, and I generally send invites to people requesting them along with a brief introduction explaining this is not a generalist instance. I don't think I have outright refused to let someone sign up that has requested—the introductory email alone has been enough to deter people.
@darius I run an instance of which I’m the only member. I decided to host my own as an exercise and I had a spare domain to use.
I’d let friends and people I know use it, if they wanted to. I don’t want to end up being an admin for a bunch of people I don’t know - if not only because its running on a fairly light server.
@darius I closed my instance after a bout of spam users and never re-opened it. I figured people are better of on other instances where one doesn't have to deal with my sysadmin skills. I'm the only active user on my pod.
@darius We went invitation-only after a rash of spammers posting links to pirated movies on our local timeline. We've also found that making people contact us to ask for invites is a great way to get to know people as they come in.
@darius I'm also in the I wanted an instance on a domain I controlled camp.
I still sometimes think I'd open registration if I ever finished CoC/CoE policies, but procrastinate.
I've offered to friends and family but so far no interest (in Mastodon generally, really).
@darius I keep my instance mostly-closed because I have stalkers and I don't like harassing bigots shitting in my living room. It just seems like a curated place is better for me and for the people I'd invite in.
@darius My instance is almost single account (people who support my other work financially get an invite because this is probably the fastest way for them to ping me on issues now that I've closed/locked down other social network accounts) but this is mostly just me wanting to not have to worry about someone else's instance going down (if mine does, it's my own fault and I can fix it if I want to) and wanting to keep server costs low.
@darius I run a closed instance that previously had a few friends on it but now is just me, happy to answer any Qs!
@darius mine is just for me. Anyone else would be too much responsibility. 😉
@darius I run one just for myself. That’s it.
Although we have not yet gotten around to assigning it to @lyrabon as a to-do for them while connected to the human internet, we plan to use closed registration with an application form to ensure that we do not have 15 folks sign up to be Rarity and no one to be Granny Smith—ask them who they plan to be and if they can maintain character.
@darius For those who don't make the cut, we will either just remind them that it is for remaining in-character or suggest other ponies for them to be (if our rejection was for balance issues rather than behavior issues).
@Celestia Oh neat, I haven't had any RP-related responses yet so this is really interesting and helpful. Thanks!
Friend Camp features several modifications that were requested by our users.
If you want decent privacy (the info doesn't leave this server), the only way to do that is to set your account to private, only accept friend requests from other friend.camp users, and only ever @ mention other friend.camp users. Once you start talking to people on other servers, all bets are off. Any private message you send to someone on another server could be looked at by the admin of a different server. This is kind of like email: if you are on a private email server, and you send an unencrypted email to a gmail account, congrats, Google now has the content of that email. But also, you do this every day, so, hey. The internet!